(Reuters) – The office of West Virginia’s attorney general said it has filed a lawsuit accusing Apple of allowing its iCloud service to become what the company’s internal communications described as the “greatest platform for distributing child porn.”

Attorney General JB McCuskey, a Republican, accused Apple of prioritizing user privacy over child safety, his office said in a statement on Thursday. It called the case the first of its kind by a government agency over the distribution of child sexual abuse material on Apple’s data storage platform.

Apple has previously denied wrongdoing in a lawsuit by private plaintiffs making similar claims.

The company has considered scanning images but abandoned the approach after concerns about user privacy and safety, including worries that it could be exploited by governments looking for other material for censorship or arrest, Reuters has reported.

“These images are a permanent record of a child’s trauma, and that child is revictimized every time the material is shared or viewed,” McCuskey said in the statement. “This conduct is despicable, and Apple’s inaction is inexcusable.”

His office cited a text message Apple’s then anti-fraud chief sent in 2020 stating that because of Apple’s priorities, it was “the greatest platform for distributing child porn.”

The state said it is seeking statutory and punitive damages and that the lawsuit filed in Mason County Circuit Court asks a judge to force Apple to implement more effective measures to detect abusive material and implement safer product designs.

Alphabet’s Google, Microsoft and other platform providers check uploaded photos or emailed attachments against a database of identifiers of known child sex abuse material provided by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and other clearing houses.

Until 2022, Apple took a different approach. It did not scan all files uploaded to its iCloud storage offerings, and the data was not end-to-end encrypted, meaning law enforcement officials could access it with a warrant.

Reuters in 2020 reported that Apple planned end-to-end encryption for iCloud, which would have put data into a form unusable by law enforcement officials. It abandoned the plan after the FBI complained it would harm investigations.

In August 2021, Apple announced NeuralHash which it designed to balance the detection of child abuse material with privacy by scanning images on users’ devices before upload.

The system was criticized by security researchers who worried it could yield false reports of abuse material and it sparked a backlash from privacy advocates who claimed it could be expanded to permit government surveillance.

A month later Apple delayed the introduction of NeuralHash before canceling it in December 2022, the state said in its statement. That same month, Apple launched an option for end-to-end encryption for iCloud data.

The state said NeuralHash was inferior to other tools and could be easily evaded. It said Apple stores and synchronizes data through iCloud without proactive abuse material detection, allowing such images to circulate.

While Apple did not go through with the effort to scan images being uploaded to iCloud, it did implement a feature called Communication Safety that blurs nudity and other sensitive content being sent to or from a child’s device.

Federal law requires U.S.-based technology companies to report abuse material to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Apple in 2023 made 267 reports, compared to 1.47 million by Google and 30.6 million by Meta Platforms, the state said.

The state’s claims mirror allegations in a proposed class action lawsuit filed against Apple in late 2024 in federal court in California by individuals depicted in such images.

Apple has moved to dismiss that lawsuit, saying the firm is shielded from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a law that provides broad protections to internet companies from lawsuits over content generated by users.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston and Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Christopher Cushing)